I think we should implement this, because if people have been here a while their points stack up and its for stuff they did a while ago.
- Type
- Suggestion
- Status
- Denied
Banned forever. Reason: Compromising Accounts
make warning points expire
- Thread starter Tulip
- Start date
- Status
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
I have. I got a warning for saying ok. Agreeing with someone is now against the rules apparently.
You said "K". One letter response. The thread did not ask for any kind of agreeing. You're taking this well out of context.
K is short for Ok. People say K, when they concede an argument in agreement. The only people taking this shit out of context is you folks. You guys act like you're changing the world with your over zealous moderation of this forum. At the end of the day, all you're doing is demonstrating how locked down and miserable this place can be. You could interrupt anything into a violation if you really wanted too.
Actually, people usually say "K" when they are told to do something or responding to something, Ive never seen someone agree with something saying "K". Its also just one dang letter, there's always more to add...
That does seem strict to give a warning for that, but if it is 110 warnings to be perma banned it's not that bad.
Also, if 1 letter responses aren't welcome, set the character minimum
The amount of warnings is really arbitrary as nara~kavi mentioned. 110 what offenses? Saying "k" 110 times? 110 scams? 110 promoting another site? No, we all know that isn't true. People have been permanently banned just for mentioning another site. And mod mood really does play a huge role in this.
Also, if you're told to do something, and your response is "k", could you supplement k for ok? yes you can, so my point is valid. K is short for ok. If a 1 letter response is that big of a deal, they should set the threshold to have a minimum character requirement for post. I've seen a lot of forums do this. Either way, it's an unjust warning, even if I do have 110 chances, doesn't change anything.
The amount of warnings is really arbitrary as nara~kavi mentioned. 110 what offenses? Saying "k" 110 times? 110 scams? 110 promoting another site? No, we all know that isn't true. People have been permanently banned just for mentioning another site. And mod mood really does play a huge role in this.
Also, if you're told to do something, and your response is "k", could you supplement k for ok? yes you can, so my point is valid. K is short for ok. If a 1 letter response is that big of a deal, they should set the threshold to have a minimum character requirement for post. I've seen a lot of forums do this. Either way, it's an unjust warning, even if I do have 110 chances, doesn't change anything.
- Status
