It's the responsibility of each individual user to read the rules, if they choose not to, in my opinion they loose the right to be annoyed at being punished. They chose to not to read the rules.
they receive a verbal warning but equally the same affect should occur with warning points
I will remind you though that it is hard to determine if something is accidental in quite a lot of cases and that could pose a problem especially with people starting to claim that their violations of the rules are accidental in order to get a "free pass"
I actually do see where you're coming from and I am willing to take this all for internal discussion and I have taken notes as I do believe that the opinion of the community is important. I do agree that some of the expiry times for warning points are a little excessive and could be re-evaluated, however for some serious offences I do think that a lengthy expiry is important.
When it comes to the amount of points given per offence of the rules, I actually think it's very well balanced, would you disagree?
I see what you mean in regards to my comparison, I don't think that it takes that long to read over the rules and pick up a general understanding even if it's not perfect, I don't expect anyone to not make mistakes, no one is perfect and that's why we have a warning system and don't just issue bans.
I will take the points further as I can see where the community is coming from in regards to moderation, but I did want to provide the other side of the coin as I think it's important to also recognise.
In conclusion to what I'm picking up from the current general consensus is that the community would prefer if we provided a more verbalised warning system for lesser first offences and reduce the expiry time on some of the offences. Obviously, I can't guarantee any of these changes but I'm happy to put them up for discussion internally as I can see where the community is coming from but it most certainly would need some serious dicussion and thought put into it.
why you have expiring warning points when mine are always permanent?Hi guys, forum dead, move on, stop wasting time writing ridiculously long passive-aggressive college-level essays that flame mick like 120275[DOUBLEPOST=1632389261][/DOUBLEPOST]View attachment 464511
staff can i have another 35 WP pls I need mcdonalds
I just wanna know why I was warned for something that was allowed at the time I was doing it and when the warning points were given I hadn't done in almost a year...
Like thats a bit stupid - why not go back through everyone who sold/bought mc accounts and ban them from MCM too?
When you open the ticket, prepare to wait. When I had an issue and opened a ticket, I went on a two week backpacking trip with no response when I got back. Took them almost 3 weeks to say "Ahh yeah. We'll look into it."I just wanna know why I was warned for something that was allowed at the time I was doing it and when the warning points were given I hadn't done in almost a year...
Like thats a bit stupid - why not go back through everyone who sold/bought mc accounts and ban them from MCM too?
When you open the ticket, prepare to wait. When I had an issue and opened a ticket, I went on a two week backpacking trip with no response when I got back. Took them almost 3 weeks to say "Ahh yeah. We'll look into it."
I understand it's a volunteer position and you have your own lives. But Mc-Market has a terrible history of response times. And even given a volunteer position, it's still a responsibility and obligation that you signed up for. Taking my two weeks outta consideration, there are plenty who have waited months for a ticket response. It's a constant complaint from the community. It's also sounds like a flaw with not just a single staff member. I'm glad you claim to respond to all your tickets within 24 hours. Have fun being complacent with current staff standards.We have a ticket queue, certain tickets have to be assigned to certain staff members who may not be instantly available.
As an example, I respond to all my tickets within 24 hours, the staff team aim to respond to all their tickets as quickly as possible, you should also remember that the staff team have lives and that MCM is not a full time position for them and sometimes things happen which result in longer wait times, of course we aim to get through them as quickly as possible.
I'm sorry that in your case you had a bit of a wait time and we're always looking at ways to improve the response times.
I understand it's a volunteer position and you have your own lives. But Mc-Market has a terrible history of response times. And even given a volunteer position, it's still a responsibility and obligation that you signed up for. Taking my two weeks outta consideration, there are plenty who have waited months for a ticket response. It's a constant complaint from the community. It's also sounds like a flaw with not just a single staff member. I'm glad you claim to respond to all your tickets within 24 hours. Have fun being complacent with current staff standards.
I did state above that it's something we're always looking to improve, I agree at times there can be gaps in the support system and tickets can get lost in queues or a staff member is away and a ticket is left, however for the most part, tickets that enter my queue are usually handled and fully completed within 48 hours of creation.
The administration and staff team are also stretched across preparing for XF2 and have a lot of work to do to complete multiple aspects of support, moderation and development moving forward.
We can only apologise for the delays that occur through some tickets but it is our aim to respond and handle our tickets as quickly as possible, sometimes it's simply not possible especially if a staff member is away or unavailable and the specific ticket requires their specific attention. I fully understand where you are coming from and like I said it's something as a team we're always looking to improve and you are right we're here to serve the community and we do our best to provide the best possible support.
This argument has been posted time and time again.I think they just need to get staff who have actually proven to be active in the community, because those are the people that spend time on here almost daily instead of getting staff members who have barely any messages/interaction with the community...
The marketplace is dwindling slowly but surely in activity every month. Probably due to the fact that Minecraft is dying, can't really sell much anymore due to guidelines getting extremely strict. Now I see other things being sold on here other than Minecraft-related things, so possibly they should have a broader approach when handling what they restrict us to sell and do, and possibly rebrand from MC-Market?So much has changed, I sort of got offline for a hot min and you can't do the following:
-Sell accounts (My raspberries account got locked offsite mcm)
-Buy or sell nitro
and I'm guessing a lot more. Add to the list in the comments.
Edit, added to the list: Loans,
