Most Reputation

Status

Sniper

Software Developer
Supreme
Feedback score
65
Posts
1,312
Reactions
695
Resources
0
Under the "Notable Members" you have most posts, most points, most reactions, etc. but not most rep?!?!
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

dawn

Visit my website @ www.d4wn.com
Supreme
Feedback score
46
Posts
1,554
Reactions
1,989
Resources
0
I think this would be a lovely idea, surely be good if you're interested in who has the most rep! ;)
 

Chearful

thomas.gg
Supreme
Feedback score
115
Posts
1,398
Reactions
2,236
Resources
0

nick

Supreme
Feedback score
24
Posts
435
Reactions
386
Resources
0
I was always thinking about suggesting this, Thanks for suggesting it. I feel like this will be a nice feature, but Im not sure how they can make it
 

Lars_1511

Lars | Server/Project Manager
Premium
Feedback score
12
Posts
212
Reactions
150
Resources
0
This sounds really cool and useful!
 

TechBanana

ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ♪
Deactivated
Feedback score
48
Posts
818
Reactions
1,060
Resources
0
Would probably just encourage meaningless reps. Like I know right now you don't have to make a deal with the person to positive / negative rep someone, but people would probably just start doing it/asking people to do it for random reasons just to get higher on the ranking (they would likely be removed like all false rep are right now, but it would just be more work for staff)
 
Last edited:

Pugle

Feedback score
0
Posts
53
Reactions
47
Resources
0
Although I personally would think this is a good idea, it would be hard to implement. I'm going under the idea that the reputation system might be a bit hard to link into the XenForo rating system; Especially in transferring reputation points, to rankable points.
 

Mick

BuiltByBit Owner
Management
Feedback score
28
Posts
6,411
Reactions
7,662
Resources
0
Would probably just encourage meaningless reps. Like I know right now you don't have to make a deal with the person to positive / negative rep someone, but people would probably just start doing it/asking people to do it for random reasons just to get higher on the ranking (they would likely be removed like all false rep are right now, but it would just be more work for staff)
Agreed. I definitely feel that we don't need this to be introduced for this reason. It would also require custom development which I don't really think it warrants.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.
 
Status
Top