Reputation

Aero512 · Oct 9, 2018

Please add some sort of way to stop people from re-adding a negative rep to someone after it was removed by mods lol?

Aero512 · Oct 10, 2018

Joba wwwwwwwwwwww said:
just delete the reputation system

xd[DOUBLEPOST=1539126264][/DOUBLEPOST]

Landn said:
"otherwise trash another member" not necessarily slander- it's trashing. Hence why "EXPOSED!!" threads are not allowed.

should only be not allowed if it is invalid/false

DivineJas · Oct 10, 2018

Aero512 said:
lmao, it got removed by admins. and you re-added it. clearly you don't have common sense.[DOUBLEPOST=1539111791][/DOUBLEPOST]
possibly like a softban for a week or two? by that time, the user will most likely forget about it and not re-add it.[DOUBLEPOST=1539115123][/DOUBLEPOST]
I reported it because it was revenge rep and mine is valid, you were trashing the guys thread even though he told you to get off of HIS thread.

but you weren't the op...

Aero512 · Oct 10, 2018

DivineJas said:
but you weren't the op...

just because I don't talk to you does not strip my right to add a negative rep to you. You were trashing his thread, now please get off this suggestion. you're literally trashing this thread right now.

DivineJas · Oct 10, 2018

Aero512 said:
just because I don't talk to you does not strip my right to add a negative rep to you. You were trashing his thread, now please get off this suggestion. you're literally trashing this thread right now.

You were not the op though... so why are you neg repping me of "thread trashing"

Aero512 · Oct 10, 2018

DivineJas said:
You were not the op though... so why are you neg repping me of "thread trashing"

Please get off this FOR THE LAST TIME, I already told you my reasoning. You obviously cannot understand simple things.

Aero512 · Oct 10, 2018

Mexify said:
It does not matter if someone is not the op of the thread anyone can neg rep you for anything and you can't neg rep someone after they neg rep you thats revenge rep.

:thumbs_up:

Mick · Jul 27, 2019

Kram said:
So, I see your point if it's the exact same reputation, there could be a way to prevent the exact same reputation from being added if it was removed.
Here's a question though, what happens if they change the wording just a little, it could still be invalid but it's no longer the exact same reputation so there would be nothing to catch that it's the same reputation.
Now, your argument could be we should just block the user from ever adding a reputation back on that user regardless but that's not really right as in the future they might have a valid reputation with proof they can provide but now they won't be allowed to negative rep the user even if it is completely valid.
Now, the easiest way really is to report it again and provide proof (if you can) that it was removed in the past. Now, it's taking a while to do reports now due to the backlog but we are working on reducing that.
I'm sure you could say for the same user to neg rep that user again it needs to go through moderation but that in the end may just create more backlog which isn't really ideal for anyone.
The only thing I currently see as a possible(ish) solution is a cooldown so that if their rep was removed they have to wait an x amount of time before adding another rep on that user. Of course, this won't stop someone who is really adamant to break the rules again but it may turn away others.
Now, with that being said, you may have an actual solution in mind which could be more effective than reporting it, if that's the case you should state it rather than saying

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.

Reputation

BuiltByBit Owner