Inb4 “that’s a biased source!”
EDIT: Seems I’m too late, but the reply is even better! “It’s too long.” Damn, wonder what would have happened if I’d said that to pretty much any professor I’ve ever had.
Last edited:
Nobel Prize winner Climate Scientist.[DOUBLEPOST=1568815214][/DOUBLEPOST]
Since you're so committed to disproof everyone.
https://www.mic.com/articles/3824/a-really-inconvenient-truth-global-warming-is-not-real
Temperature brings up Greenhouse gasses, not the other way around.[DOUBLEPOST=1568813757][/DOUBLEPOST]
Wow a government funded program, not biased at all lmao.
It's all politics.
Your president is a climate change denier... struggling to see where the political bias would come in but okay![]()
![]()
I'm not using Donald Trump as an argument lmao. And it shows the maliciousness of the narrative, when you disagree, you get labeled as a 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER". It's just a term to invalidate our arguments.
He’s saying that when the government’s most top official is saying climate change is false, would it not be more logical to assume that governmental sources would be biased in his FAVOR? As opposed to being biased against that position like you suggested earlier with NASA?I'm not using Donald Trump as an argument lmao. And it shows the maliciousness of the narrative, when you disagree, you get labeled as a 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER". It's just a term to invalidate our arguments.
Not saying either of you are right/wrong, but in the U.S, the majority of government dislikes Trump. Same with the population. It's considered taboo to agree with his statements or support him. Not your fault for not knowing though, as you don't live here.Your president is a climate change denier... struggling to see where the political bias would come in but okay![]()
![]()
Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government. He's not a dictator, he doesn't have that power.You've completely missed my point. I'm saying your president and your government is not pushing a narrative like you're suggesting.
Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government. He's not a dictator, he doesn't have that power.
Hmm but the republicans do agree on one thing, that climate change does not exist... atleast thats what the 64 million dollar oil lobbying money if for.
(I know not all republicans deny climate change, but a handful amount do, and they happened to be paid by big oil companies)
Half the senate is on his side. How can anyone quantify the feelings of the entire bureaucracy? Surly it must consist of people for and against him, just like the general public (which definitely doesn’t hate him since it voted him into office).Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government.
Half the senate is on his side. How can anyone quantify the feelings of the entire bureaucracy? Surly it must consist of people for and against him, just like the general public (which definitely doesn’t hate him since it voted him into office).
Okay. Why does that mean they hate him? What possible motive do they have that would convince anyone that they dislike him?Programs like NASA and such aren't Trump programs, they were there before Trump was elected.
The word you’re looking for is bureaucracy. Government bodies are made up of real people like you and I, not politicians with agendas. Parks and Recreation is based on this mundanity.That's how the deep state works.
NovaLegion
You have provided no proof of your claims while everything that is said against your opinions has been backed up by scientists.
Climate change's a real thing.
Explain why the deserts are spreading? https://www.livescience.com/62168-sahara-desert-expanding.html
Explain why 2017 was the coldest winter east US has ever experienced?
Explain why Florida is recently dealing with a growing amount of hurricanes?
Explain why last year Europe and Australia have experienced their hottest summers?
Explain why sea level is rising?
Explain why the icebergs are melting?
You have no explanation to this except for "this has nothing to do with climate change", though, you refuse to accept the fact that these things never happened 200 years ago. It's happening now, after the the industrial Revolution, and after the whole world has adobted those methods.
Any type of proof, you dismiss it, no matter how true it is, you're just comfortable dismissing them because you refuse to change your lifestyle to help this dying planet. This is exactly what "Don't confuse me with the facts" about. This is you.
Weather is affected by climate. And no, I'm no going to listen to those 3 scientists who say it doesn't exist and ignore the hunders others. Just like I'll ignore the geniuses saying Earth's flat, or people saying vaccines make you autistic. They're all dumb, and they all base their assumptions on opinions.Nah bro. You people are so far up your own ass that you refuse to acknowledge scientists that don't agree with the narrative.
You cherry pick everything.
Also, I thought weather wasn't climate, oh boy, only when it fits the narrative.
But keep trying though.
