Climate Change is real

Status
This thread has been locked.

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0

Inb4 “that’s a biased source!”

EDIT: Seems I’m too late, but the reply is even better! “It’s too long.” Damn, wonder what would have happened if I’d said that to pretty much any professor I’ve ever had.
 
Last edited:

Isaac

grphcrtv.com
Supreme
Feedback score
3
Posts
270
Reactions
290
Resources
0

NovaLegion

Premium
Feedback score
5
Posts
255
Reactions
122
Resources
0
Your president is a climate change denier... struggling to see where the political bias would come in but okay
BjIm7iSrVRDX6kHicE_stfvuvM96M-DvKfTaJTUuWHSKua8j8CJNujTzJt_Tp83mkIOPPYKvetUTRssizqhqUQrLL3EKMq8xIVgHKdpdz2uEZvy9lH_Lj3VcLdTVP9akBjhXQbTv
Screenshot_2017_06_01_16.34.32.0.png

I'm not using Donald Trump as an argument lmao. And it shows the maliciousness of the narrative, when you disagree, you get labeled as a 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER". It's just a term to invalidate our arguments.
 

Isaac

grphcrtv.com
Supreme
Feedback score
3
Posts
270
Reactions
290
Resources
0
I'm not using Donald Trump as an argument lmao. And it shows the maliciousness of the narrative, when you disagree, you get labeled as a 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER". It's just a term to invalidate our arguments.

You've completely missed my point. I'm saying your president and your government is not pushing a narrative like you're suggesting.
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
I'm not using Donald Trump as an argument lmao. And it shows the maliciousness of the narrative, when you disagree, you get labeled as a 'CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER". It's just a term to invalidate our arguments.
He’s saying that when the government’s most top official is saying climate change is false, would it not be more logical to assume that governmental sources would be biased in his FAVOR? As opposed to being biased against that position like you suggested earlier with NASA?
 

User

i left click on lego people
Supreme
Feedback score
107
Posts
3,721
Reactions
2,538
Resources
0
Your president is a climate change denier... struggling to see where the political bias would come in but okay
BjIm7iSrVRDX6kHicE_stfvuvM96M-DvKfTaJTUuWHSKua8j8CJNujTzJt_Tp83mkIOPPYKvetUTRssizqhqUQrLL3EKMq8xIVgHKdpdz2uEZvy9lH_Lj3VcLdTVP9akBjhXQbTv
Screenshot_2017_06_01_16.34.32.0.png
Not saying either of you are right/wrong, but in the U.S, the majority of government dislikes Trump. Same with the population. It's considered taboo to agree with his statements or support him. Not your fault for not knowing though, as you don't live here.
 

NovaLegion

Premium
Feedback score
5
Posts
255
Reactions
122
Resources
0
You've completely missed my point. I'm saying your president and your government is not pushing a narrative like you're suggesting.
Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government. He's not a dictator, he doesn't have that power.
 

X8.

Developer
Premium
Feedback score
14
Posts
1,040
Reactions
612
Resources
0
Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government. He's not a dictator, he doesn't have that power.

Hmm but the republicans do agree on one thing, that climate change does not exist... atleast thats what the 64 million dollar oil lobbying money if for.

(I know not all republicans deny climate change, but a handful amount do, and they happened to be paid by big oil companies)
 

NovaLegion

Premium
Feedback score
5
Posts
255
Reactions
122
Resources
0
Hmm but the republicans do agree on one thing, that climate change does not exist... atleast thats what the 64 million dollar oil lobbying money if for.

(I know not all republicans deny climate change, but a handful amount do, and they happened to be paid by big oil companies)

lol.
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
Trump is not exactly loved by the U.S. government.
Half the senate is on his side. How can anyone quantify the feelings of the entire bureaucracy? Surly it must consist of people for and against him, just like the general public (which definitely doesn’t hate him since it voted him into office).
 

NovaLegion

Premium
Feedback score
5
Posts
255
Reactions
122
Resources
0
Half the senate is on his side. How can anyone quantify the feelings of the entire bureaucracy? Surly it must consist of people for and against him, just like the general public (which definitely doesn’t hate him since it voted him into office).

Programs like NASA and such aren't Trump programs, they were there before Trump was elected. That's how the deep state works.
 

Red

Chromatic Polymath
Supreme
Feedback score
34
Posts
1,251
Reactions
632
Resources
0
Programs like NASA and such aren't Trump programs, they were there before Trump was elected.
Okay. Why does that mean they hate him? What possible motive do they have that would convince anyone that they dislike him?
That's how the deep state works.
The word you’re looking for is bureaucracy. Government bodies are made up of real people like you and I, not politicians with agendas. Parks and Recreation is based on this mundanity.
 

EpicFooF

Digital Artist
Premium
Feedback score
13
Posts
1,438
Reactions
520
Resources
2
NovaLegion
You have provided no proof of your claims while everything that is said against your opinions has been backed up by scientists.

Climate change's a real thing.
Explain why the deserts are spreading? https://www.livescience.com/62168-sahara-desert-expanding.html
Explain why 2017 was the coldest winter east US has ever experienced?
Explain why Florida is recently dealing with a growing amount of hurricanes?
Explain why last year Europe and Australia have experienced their hottest summers?
Explain why sea level is rising?
Explain why the icebergs are melting?

You have no explanation to this except for "this has nothing to do with climate change", though, you refuse to accept the fact that these things never happened 200 years ago. It's happening now, after the the industrial Revolution, and after the whole world has adobted those methods.

Any type of proof, you dismiss it, no matter how true it is, you're just comfortable dismissing them because you refuse to change your lifestyle to help this dying planet. This is exactly what "Don't confuse me with the facts" about.
 
Last edited:

NJ_

Parody Account
Supreme
Feedback score
15
Posts
448
Reactions
264
Resources
0
ok very cool, but nobodys gonna blame china which accounts for nearly 4x more CO2 emissions than the USA, but don't worry, 16 year old autistic girl says stop eating meat
 

NovaLegion

Premium
Feedback score
5
Posts
255
Reactions
122
Resources
0
NovaLegion
You have provided no proof of your claims while everything that is said against your opinions has been backed up by scientists.

Climate change's a real thing.
Explain why the deserts are spreading? https://www.livescience.com/62168-sahara-desert-expanding.html
Explain why 2017 was the coldest winter east US has ever experienced?
Explain why Florida is recently dealing with a growing amount of hurricanes?
Explain why last year Europe and Australia have experienced their hottest summers?
Explain why sea level is rising?
Explain why the icebergs are melting?

You have no explanation to this except for "this has nothing to do with climate change", though, you refuse to accept the fact that these things never happened 200 years ago. It's happening now, after the the industrial Revolution, and after the whole world has adobted those methods.

Any type of proof, you dismiss it, no matter how true it is, you're just comfortable dismissing them because you refuse to change your lifestyle to help this dying planet. This is exactly what "Don't confuse me with the facts" about. This is you.

Nah bro. You people are so far up your own ass that you refuse to acknowledge scientists that don't agree with the narrative.
You cherry pick everything.

Also, I thought weather wasn't climate, oh boy, only when it fits the narrative.
But keep trying though.
 

EpicFooF

Digital Artist
Premium
Feedback score
13
Posts
1,438
Reactions
520
Resources
2
Nah bro. You people are so far up your own ass that you refuse to acknowledge scientists that don't agree with the narrative.
You cherry pick everything.

Also, I thought weather wasn't climate, oh boy, only when it fits the narrative.
But keep trying though.
Weather is affected by climate. And no, I'm no going to listen to those 3 scientists who say it doesn't exist and ignore the hunders others. Just like I'll ignore the geniuses saying Earth's flat, or people saying vaccines make you autistic. They're all dumb, and they all base their assumptions on opinions.
They try to feel special and get attention from people, and this is their way - fighting against everything that is persumed to be true by the whole world, form a group of desperate people like them, just so they'll have the amount of attention they need, just so they can feel belong to a group of people who think like them. They will dismiss and deny every proof brought to them, say we're all wrong, yet they will fail to provide a single proof for their claims. Those people are sad, and are also dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been locked.
Top