Remove thread trashing negative rep

Status

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
Thread trashing reputation shouldnt be allowed/be reviewed

A lot of People neg reps for "thread trashing" for no reason at all (like Toxicity) for example.
Person A: Selling an account with almost no info
Person B: Adds info like: It's banned on _____
Person A: Neg Reps

Do u think someone deserves a negative (that Means a lot for new users) for giving information about an account?

Another example
Person A: Selling a scam account
Person B: This account was owned by a scammer, deal with caution
Person A: Neg Reps without trying to deal the Situation.

Is giving information about something that they're most likely interested BAD?

I'm talking about this type of trashing thread rep. I agree with neg repping for dudes saying something that isn't in the topic/related Nor spamming
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.

blob

Supreme
Feedback score
47
Posts
1,349
Reactions
905
Resources
0
Thread trashing reputation shouldnt be allowed/be reviewed

A lot of People neg reps for "thread trashing" for no reason at all (like Toxicity) for example.
Person A: Selling an account with almost no info
Person B: Adds info like: It's banned on _____
Person A: Neg Reps

Do u think someone deserves a negative (that Means a lot for new users) for giving information about an account?

Another example
Person A: Selling a scam account
Person B: This account was owned by a scammer, deal with caution
Person A: Neg Reps without trying to deal the Situation.

Is giving information about something that they're most likely interested BAD?

I'm talking about this type of trashing thread rep. I agree with neg repping for dudes saying something that isn't in the topic/related Nor spamming
I mean I'm quite sure that you cannot use reputation as a punishment (therefore "thread trashing" neg rep wouldn't be allowed)
 

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
I mean I'm quite sure that you cannot use reputation as a punishment (therefore "thread trashing" neg rep wouldn't be allowed)
Welcome to mcmarket, users dont give no fuck about rules and staff doesn't care about rep reports
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
Why do people feel the need to make suggestions when it's already a thing?
Maybe if the staff read the rules this wont happen
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
It's not hard to re-make the thread, pin pointing the rule(s) so staff can't say otherwise.
What are u talking about LOL?
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
Talking about support requests. I assume you've made support requests and staff tried to tell you otherwise? If not, then I am not sure why you brought up that "staff doesn't know the rules" thing.
The staff team doesn't check them and if they check they DONT DO NOTHING and say the same even if it doesn't make Sense
Someone neg repped me "unpleasant and trashing threads" and i reported it, after almost a week the staff said: u need to talk to the member and deal with it blah blah blah.
I can make u sure they didn't take care nor read it
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
People make mistakes, but if you have bad experiences with the same staff member more than once, it's likely not a mistake and they just dislike you and are letting that affect how they do their job so tagging a staff member who is not the one who doesn't do their job well should do the trick
U cant see who did it.....
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

katana2

stackin’ blue faces straight to the ceilin’.
Banned
Feedback score
12
Posts
1,822
Reactions
1,080
Resources
0
So it sounds like you used the report system, which is not at all what I've been trying to suggest you to do.
If u can't read properly dont reply
 
Banned forever. Reason: Rules violations

alice

Supreme
Feedback score
24
Posts
310
Reactions
178
Resources
0
they should just remove all reputation threads, everyone cares way too fucking much about it
 

Landon

wow!
Supreme
Feedback score
111
Posts
1,590
Reactions
2,040
Resources
7
Thread trashing reputation shouldnt be allowed/be reviewed

A lot of People neg reps for "thread trashing" for no reason at all (like Toxicity) for example.
Person A: Selling an account with almost no info
Person B: Adds info like: It's banned on _____
Person A: Neg Reps

Do u think someone deserves a negative (that Means a lot for new users) for giving information about an account?

Another example
Person A: Selling a scam account
Person B: This account was owned by a scammer, deal with caution
Person A: Neg Reps without trying to deal the Situation.

Is giving information about something that they're most likely interested BAD?

I'm talking about this type of trashing thread rep. I agree with neg repping for dudes saying something that isn't in the topic/related Nor spamming
Your scenarios aren't consistent with what happens.

"Hey guys, selling Italics code"
"lmfao fuck off lol shit codes useless website fake shit lmao if you buy ur dumb"
(This is pretty much what happened on my thread).

Of course, providing information isn't thread trashing, what I gave an example of is.
 

Satan

Devil#0666
Supreme
Feedback score
52
Posts
3,667
Reactions
1,442
Resources
0
they should just remove all reputation threads, everyone cares way too fucking much about it
MCM back in the days didn't have reputation system at all. The one implemented was... least to say inefficient after people got used to seeing it fully used. When it first came out, the general feedback was like HEY ITS GREAT!
 
Status
Top