Removing Banned Peoples Rep

[Nine]

I recently got wiped of a few rep because of some of them people were banned, I still done legitimate deals with them tho?
So why the heck does that mean they should have to remove my rep for peoples wrong doings?

I say they don't delete peoples rep off of your profile even if they get banned.

 

[Will]

what the hell? this is actually the stupidest thing i've ever heard. why would u remove somones rep that they got through legit ways JUST because they are banned. this is an all time low for mcm (somehow) and these should be reinstated

 

[Nine]

Fun times

 

[Chearful]

I had this done to my rep a while back (never got it back so be grateful they have a soft-delete system now). Nowhere does it state it in the rules so not sure why staff are doing this let alone why a suggestion needs to be made to stop it from happening when it shouldn't be happening in the first place.

 

[Nine]

I had this done to my rep a while back (never got it back so be grateful they have a soft-delete system now). Nowhere does it state it in the rules so not sure why staff are doing this let alone why a suggestion needs to be made to stop it from happening when it shouldn't be happening in the first place.

They’ve now started making dispute chats which is helpful but it seems as if it came after I made this suggestion

 

[Nine]

dude im still hiding from them, IM BOUTTA GET FUCKED LMAOO

FUCKING RUN WHILE YOU CAN MY WHITE FRIEND

 

[on]

i’ve had some neg rep removed from people that have revenge repped or neg repped for other reasons, and they got removed because the user is banned.

however, i believe that users that have left positive (or negative) rep for legitimate trades, they should stay on your profile

 

[t-rex]

 

[Nine]

lmfao ofc the 2 mods vote yes

You mean no

 

[LavarBall]

yeah I lost some of mine too this is quite bullshit[DOUBLEPOST=1566350392][/DOUBLEPOST]buttox in my butt

 

[Aekalix]

Ok Kram and Justis, i see that u both disagree as u both might think that "they are banned, they're not part of the community blah blah blah" (what Justis has said DOZENS of time)

Then if banned People arent a part of the community, why did bank got banned for "Doxing community members" when they were banned? Why the "he's banned he's not a part of the community" isn't being used in this case? maybe double standards?

Thanks for reading, have a nice day.

They'll never respond to you since that would show their double standards.

 

[Nine]

They'll never respond to you since that would show their double standards.

Justis R agreed at least

 

[Aekalix]

Justis R agreed at least

That's intriguing, the guy is still banned though.

 

[Samuel]

I don't think I've suffered from this, but honestly it's stupid.

 

[Kram]

Ok Kram and Justis, i see that u both disagree as u both might think that "they are banned, they're not part of the community blah blah blah" (what Justis has said DOZENS of time)

Then if banned People arent a part of the community, why did bank got banned for "Doxing community members" when they were banned? Why the "he's banned he's not a part of the community" isn't being used in this case? maybe double standards?

Thanks for reading, have a nice day.

The majority of the time, we try to keep ban reasons uniform, that is likely why he was banned under the ban reason doxing community members. It’s not a matter of double standards. Bank would have been banned regardless of the account status of the person he doxed. Doxing is something we cannot approve of and to not ban Bank would be to show it is okay to dox certain people which is most certainly not the case.

They'll never respond to you since that would show their double standards.

I didn’t think a reply was needed because when I saw the message I saw Justis already agreed to the post, which I felt was sufficient.

That's intriguing, the guy is still banned though.

He won’t be unbanned. Just because the person he doxed was banned doesn't make it alright.