Hot Summer Deals are Here!
Celebrate with up to 90% off on 14,400 resources
04
Days
16
Hours
48
Mins
23
Secs
View all deals

Review Dispute System

Status
Dean

Dean

Connoisseur of Cancellation
Banned
Feedback score
8
Posts
492
Reactions
243
Resources
0
I left a negative review about 7 months ago on Corebot, after they responded it wouldn't allow me to edit my review's text to make it a higher or lower review. But thats not the main issue I'd like to talk about.

So as I said I made the review about 7 months ago and today they had filed a review dispute the reason I think they did this is to help decrease the amount of evidence someone would have supporting their review, I think most people probably clean up their pc files by this time/wouldn't have a defence for the dispute as they cleaned up their files or there is simply just too many files to look through.

To help mitigate this I think there should be a restriction on how old a review is for you to be able to dispute it for example if a dispute is more than 90 days old you lose the ability to dispute it, this gives plenty of time for the resource holder to dispute the review. I would prefer if it was shorter than this something closer to 30 days.
 
Type
Suggestion
Status
Denied
Banned forever. Reason: TOS violation
Upvote 6 Downvote
PebbleHost
High performance, consistent uptime and fast support. Minecraft hosting that just works.
Scroll32

Scroll32

Supreme
Feedback score
101
Posts
1,725
Reactions
421
Resources
0
Assuming this is from the date they files the disputed not when they get to it (as it takes a while to get to) then yeah it’s a good idea.
 
Dean

Dean

Connoisseur of Cancellation
Banned
Feedback score
8
Posts
492
Reactions
243
Resources
0
Scroll32 said:
Assuming this is from the date they files the disputed not when they get to it (as it takes a while to get to) then yeah it’s a good idea.
Click to expand...
As long as they file the dispute within the set period. Then it should go through.
 
Banned forever. Reason: TOS violation
Dean

Dean

Connoisseur of Cancellation
Banned
Feedback score
8
Posts
492
Reactions
243
Resources
0
Sparko said:
Well what if someone gives a false reputation to an inactive member?
Click to expand...
This isn't the reputation its the resource review system, and if its inactive the review is more than likely being directed towards the inactivity of updates & support. If not then it would still be on the resource author to respond within a decent amount of time, why I suggested such a long period 3 months? 1 quarter of a year. Its a long time to respond to a review / dispute it.
 
Banned forever. Reason: TOS violation
Sparko

Sparko

professional amateur
Supreme
Feedback score
82
Posts
1,986
Reactions
959
Resources
0
Dean said:
This isn't the reputation its the resource review system, and if its inactive the review is more than likely being directed towards the inactivity of updates & support. If not then it would still be on the resource author to respond within a decent amount of time, why I suggested such a long period 3 months? 1 quarter of a year. Its a long time to respond to a review / dispute it.
Click to expand...
Oh that's why it was weird to read lol, yeah your suggestion makes sense then.
 
Mick

Mick

BuiltByBit Owner
Management
Feedback score
28
Posts
6,411
Reactions
7,662
Resources
0
A system very similar to this has been suggested, but ultimately denied each time. To implement something like this for resource reviews would require us to further expand our staff team for it as we had to do with our reputation disputes, and it's just not really the best thing for us to do right now given the backlog that we have for some staff roles.

There has been a different idea suggested that will hopefully assist with this problem which is to make it so that users must download and wait for a period before being able to leave a resource review. It's not perfect, but it should be an improvement.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion
 
Status
Top