Staff don't know how to deal with reputation reports

[pace]

Well i've been quite shocked at how this staff member has been dealing with reputation reports allowing reputation's that say " Vouch, we played fortnite together, very well-mannered individual . " which means we can rep people for playing with them? so we can as well neg rep people for being terrible at playing games? how is this possible as well i never knew you can fucking rep someone for not wanting to deal with you? i mean like wow this is what i got when i reported the rep
"If someone has a negative opinion of you, and you wish to improve your reputation, it is your responsibility to improve their opinion of you and therefore your reputation via communication with the reputation author."
10/10 response best staff member out there ofc BucketOfSloths allowing us to rep others for playing fortnite allowing us to rep others for not wanting to deal with us 10/10

Oh yes not to forget allowing us to rep our own business team since when was that allowed??

"Zeimzey repping his own business account saying this |
Unfortunately, your recent report was rejected: I absolutely love Empire Services. Such a great service team! | https://prnt.sc/kbk1re 10/10 moderator

 

[Fawks]

The thing which pisses me off staff who don't want to deal with a rep just paste the same goddamn shit over and over about improving your relations with the member. Why would I improve relations with the member when they hit me offline and they false repped me for "claims" when I even sent in proof with the report.

 

[utaninja]

I agree, the only reason I have warning points is because I vouch’ed on my business teams thread, (saying that it’s my team). There needs to be more clarity and better and equal judgment.

 

[Ambrosia]

I got falsely repped by someone for "harassing" when I was just informing another user they broke the rules. I've made a report and am still awaiting a response, but seeing all these other responses makes me lose faith in being able to get rid of this false reputation.

Hey, you revenge repped me. Guess what, you never even read the reputation. Get a pair of glasses and read.

 

[punctured]

Staff member #3 - According to this staff member, if a member is banned and left you a rep, then that rep should be removed because they are banned. lol! Although, they do reply to support requests pretty quickly which is OK.

^ picture of a different staff member confirming why a rep left for me was removed

Response from staff member #3: https://i.chear.io/91152da4-5277-4d85-bca8-a1e3eb4714ca.png

I believe that Justis at one point stated that rep was for the community's opinion and so banned members are no longer members of this community so their rep does not hold value enough to keep as a current number.

Honestly I was quite mad with my 2 neg reps but they really don't mean anything anymore Coat is a stuck up kid with money, and I got revenged rep'd it really doesn't matter

Backing out of a deal is stupidly annoying and is grounds for a valid reputation ding with how the current system works in my opinion.

 

[Chearful]

I believe that Justis at one point stated that rep was for the community's opinion and so banned members are no longer members of this community so their rep does not hold value enough to keep as a current number.

That wasn't ever set in stone. It was just post on a suggestion thread stating his opinion rather than setting something in stone.

 

[moon10k]

I thought a new member should go first in deals, because he's new. Turns out he was popular on other forums. I didn't know, got fucking neg repped for it, staff didn't do shit about it, but guy ended up removing it a month later.

 

[punctured]

That wasn't ever set in stone. It was just post on a suggestion thread stating his opinion rather than setting something in stone.

I certainly don't agree with it but I think that's why some staff are confused and the inconsistencies are present.

 

[cunjur]

People neg rep for stupid reasons because they know there's no repercussions. I get negged all the time for telling people information when it doesn't benifit the users thread etc and they eventually get removed. I've seen sites use rep as a completely seperate thing to measure what kind of person you are and vouches for deals. I personally prefer this system as it breaks it down and would be easier to handle for moderators and more useful as users.

 

[txt]

I'm glad someone already brought this up. Although the title probably doesn't help. I am fairly new to the website and listed a couple of my accounts for sale. One of them had a past owner that had attempted to scam my friend but after that I got the account, secured it, and have had it for months. A dude jumped on me when he backed out of buying it when I asked to use a MM. Instantly started accusing me of scamming, talking shit, then negged me after I said he was most likely scamming as he backed out the second I mentioned using a middleman. I reported the reputation multiple times and each time got denied with no explanation . I've messaged almost every staff member about it, only one replied saying the system needs work, the others didn't bother to read let a lone respond. I was under the impression the reputation system was for people to prove themselves reputable after they deal with people, not to hold grudges and leave petty comments when they don't get their own way to make a seller look bad.

This honestly needs a change to be only deal related, until then it'll probably just remain a mess.

 

[Flipora]

rep is bullshit, not only is it complete bullshit but its very easy to get it removed. you just give them a negative rep thats some complete bullshit but sounds specific so the staff think its real, wait a few days, and send them a pm saying if they remove theirs you will remove yours. thats what like half the people ive left negative reps on have done to me and i have no way to fix it and tbh its a great idea because staff are too stupid to stop it

 

[John]

If I remember right I had to report a neg rep TWICE when the user THREATENED TO KILL ME IN SAID NEG REP

 

[BrettPlays]

I'm just waiting for the guy with -7+ reputation that neg repped me to get banned so I can report it to staff to get it removed lmao.

 

[jakey2_0]

MCM Rep means NOTHING.

 

[pace]

MCM Rep means NOTHING.

hence why people are able to scam using it, MCM rep means alot of shit without it the scam reports would be double the amount of how much it is currently or even triple

 

[Rouing]

I stopped caring about the rep system. Its quite obvious. Just look at my neg reps.


One (JMH) I dont even know who he is nor have I interacted with him.

One (Bumblewasp) is about me posting swastikas but the staff ignores the fact that hes asserting this as facts without proof and goes straight to: ITS AN OPINION which is really just slander that is quite illegal and the staff are basically condoning tagging an opinion to some false evidence in order to maintain false rep.

One (ObamaMilk) is about something I am not even involved in and I had proof of but gave me 5 (5!) different excuses as to why they wouldnt remove it.

One (Choo) says Meanie Boy

One (58445) Says I am not a sysadmin nor do I have the certs I have yet I have the verification codes plastered all over the forums

(WAS JUST REMOVED)

One is by C a l l u m [I treasure this one.]

 

[58445]

I stopped caring about the rep system. Its quite obvious. Just look at my neg reps.


One (JMH) I dont even know who he is nor have I interacted with him.

One (Bumblewasp) is about me posting swastikas but the staff ignores the fact that hes asserting this as facts without proof and goes straight to: ITS AN OPINION which is really just slander that is quite illegal and the staff are basically condoning tagging an opinion to some false evidence in order to maintain false rep.

One (ObamaMilk) is about something I am not even involved in and I had proof of but gave me 5 (5!) different excuses as to why they wouldnt remove it.

One (Choo) says Meanie Boy

One (58445) Says I am not a sysadmin nor do I have the certs I have yet I have the verification codes plastered all over the forums

(WAS JUST REMOVED)

One is by C a l l u m

Seriously you are a weird type of alien that I never met before. So I would kindly ask to remove it here as well.

 

[pace]

I stopped caring about the rep system. Its quite obvious. Just look at my neg reps.


One (JMH) I dont even know who he is nor have I interacted with him.

One (Bumblewasp) is about me posting swastikas but the staff ignores the fact that hes asserting this as facts without proof and goes straight to: ITS AN OPINION which is really just slander that is quite illegal and the staff are basically condoning tagging an opinion to some false evidence in order to maintain false rep.

One (ObamaMilk) is about something I am not even involved in and I had proof of but gave me 5 (5!) different excuses as to why they wouldnt remove it.

One (Choo) says Meanie Boy

One (58445) Says I am not a sysadmin nor do I have the certs I have yet I have the verification codes plastered all over the forums

(WAS JUST REMOVED)

One is by C a l l u m [I treasure this one.]

what i am talking about is the reputation system in general which is Postive, Neutral, negative not only about negative just for your information

and Choo's is clearly unvalid because it's non descriptive open a support request over Juydhen & Obama if it was justis ur lucky if bucket of sloths no because he just denies any report if it was descriptive he just doesn't care about what u say and just denies