I see you're using vivaldi. Child of class right here folks.
Turn JAVASCRIPT off to bypass the "Turn of ad blocker"
Standing Firm Against Leak Sites
- Thread starter Justis
- Start date
- Status
It's a image from Google.. Trying to be funny yet you look like an idiot now.
Does MC-Market even offer any protection mechanism?
Prior to imposing this new rule, you should provide a resource protection system. Even spigot’s simple protection mechanism, if you utilise properly (which many devs don’t), you can prevent resources sold on your platform get leaked.
Prior to imposing this new rule, you should provide a resource protection system. Even spigot’s simple protection mechanism, if you utilise properly (which many devs don’t), you can prevent resources sold on your platform get leaked.
Last edited:
The heck are you talking about?
Attachments
Is there any kind of anti piracy system? I mean so someone downloads my plugin and the system saves their server name so If I see my plugin in a leaks site I download my plugin, run a command, and I can see the user ID of the one downloading it? (I dont know if I can say the name but the other market site has it and it has been useful for me)
I know there are ways to bypass this but it makes their lives a little bit harder if you do it right
I know there are ways to bypass this but it makes their lives a little bit harder if you do it right
Last edited:
The main reason why developers who have popular plugins elsewhere do not post them here is because MC-Market lacks important things that can help us creators protect our work.
Let me be clear: You (MCM) should never spend time into automatically "protecting" plugins. Let every author have their own system but provide us with the tools to do so. That way protections stay unique to the author and it gives him/her the oppertunity to change or enforce it. (See my PM from last year to Mick and you - Jan 2018)
Let me be clear: You (MCM) should never spend time into automatically "protecting" plugins. Let every author have their own system but provide us with the tools to do so. That way protections stay unique to the author and it gives him/her the oppertunity to change or enforce it. (See my PM from last year to Mick and you - Jan 2018)
Last edited:
Mick
But I do like the idea of giving users the tools to help against leaks rather than just an automatic system. It gives more freedom to the user and to the people who actually care about this stuff.
Last edited:
Just going to put this here.
https://www.mc-market.org/threads/317663/
https://www.mc-market.org/threads/317663/
This works with early plugins or plugins with none or low security. As soon as you have some security that they need to spend time on, it is no use.
It is a nice feature, but it will cause a lot of users to simply post a useless update to see how long it takes to get leaked
Isn't this actually against some country laws? For me in the UK, in 1988, a law was passed about copyright which includes:
- copying your work;
- distributing copies of it, whether free of charge or for sale;
- renting or lending copies of your work;
- performing, showing or playing your work in public;
- making an adaptation of your work;
- putting it on the internet;
What you're suggesting is utterly stupid and false. No one is "forcing" you to pay with F&F, simply don't buy it.
alright i get if you disagree with it for selfish reasons because you dont want to deal with chargebacks but don't act like this is anything but selfishness, dont call my shit stupid.
it was very obvious that i meant if you want to buy the thing not they are literally forcing you to buy their product
the problem is in most cases, unlike developing which you do and is overcrowded and you can just find the next person to do the exact same thing for better, there isn't much competition. take fornite accounts for example. if you find an account you really like, you can't just "find another person" because two accounts aren't the same. its this or nothing, and the fact is most of the time people will just let their optimism take over and hope that the person is a scumbag which sadly for MCM isn't true. THE ONLY REASON that people have against this is that they don't want to deal with chargebacks which is lying to paypal and using it for an unintended use for selfish reasons. its a fuck the buyer the sellers do what they want situation and that is why i do not like it especially when sellers say "simply don't buy it" as if i've done something wrong by trying to cut down on scummy scammers. i assume you are not a scammer, but imagine if you were a buyer dealing with a scummy site with loads of scammers, you need insurance.
Are you still talking about plugins or any transaction sparked from a mcm thread?
I'm talking in general, that MCM shouldn't enforce such rule. I'm not against the rule specifically as I, myself deal only via G&S whether I'm the buyer or the seller, but, I'm against MCM enforcing such rule because it would take away the freedom of other dealers and in general I find it stupid to have such a rule.
- Status
