More "fake" emojis

[Croc]

I've given up trying to get Mick to implement support for real unicode emojis, so he should give the site more "fake" emojis like NamePros.

 

[Justis]

I feel like they should do A poll instead of always disagreeing with not adding more emojis

The agree and disagree reaction in suggestion threads are the means of polling.
Who is "they" supposed to refer to?

 

[Uh]

The agree and disagree reaction in suggestion threads are the means of polling.
Who is "they" supposed to refer to?

I meant like a huge poll for the whole server to know where it is and vote. "they" as in staff.

 

[MarkFreak]

Our modest selection of emojis is much better for our marketplace. It puts emphasis on the actual text that you're writing and ensures threads aren't being used to relive everyone's childhood kik group chat memories.
I would not find it too upseting if emojis were removed completely, in fact.
The addition of more is an absolute no, however.

Reputation that doesn't involve a deal rather feelings and emotions about the person is allowed on this marketplace but we can't have emote's which have been involved in the way humans speak for years.

If reputation that involves emotions is allowed then why do you think emoji's that are shortcuts to what our current emotions shouldn't be welcome on this marketplace?

 

[Mick]

I'll add all of these smilies if you boys let me remove and :rekt:

But otherwise, we're not adding any more smilies, I already regret those two that I added.

Denied, thanks for the suggestion.